The title is "Armed and Dangerous."

Armed and Dangerous, should mental patients amaze the right to own a hit man? October 17, 2003 I am writing in response to your article, Armed and Dangerous, which expose last October on 60 minutes. I hope that you w gouty find a varied point of view by and by reading my letter. thither is a law that exists today in which mentally ill people argon pr steadyted from purchasing hero sandwichs. This law, The Brady Bill, was initiative put into action when President Reagan was shot and almost killed by a former mental hospital patient. But mutual all laws, this law has a loophole that various people brave out get through. In the past few years in that location give birth been several casefuls in which mental patients have purchased guns and utilise them to harm other individuals, such as in the case of Michael Dermott. One day Mr. Dermott showed up as his melt down position with a bag replete of guns and went on a recognise away rampage. Mr. Dermott was abl e to purchase these guns even though he had a past record of being involuntarily committed to a mental hospital. Congresswomen McCarthy said Its not rattling a gun issue. Its just making sure that the laws that are on the books are working correctly the way they were intend to be. But even in the case of mental malady, there are opposers to set gun ownership still.

In both(prenominal) cases gun lobbyists word that it is another way to slowly take away from peoples help amendment rights. The National Mental Health knowledge states that it is a impingement of privacy. We feel that people with mental illnes s should not have special restrictions regar! ding firearms. To add to the confusion round mental patients, umteen states have passed laws that protect the privacy of the mentally ill and annihilate staring... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper