Free Speech -- essays research papers

The Constitution of the united States states in its prototypic Amendment that "Congress shall make no law respecting an arrangement of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof or abridging the granting immunity of speech, or of the press or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the presidential term for a redress of grievances" (Funk & Wagnalls 162). This Amendment guarantees each soul of free speech. Does this think up that a individual can stand in the middle of the channel and yell anything he wants? No, society, even though it cherishes granting immunity of speech, does give this freedom certain parapets. Why does society find it necessary to restrict freedom of speech? Does this ensure a more controlled society? Let us imagine a society that has no restrictions of speech. For example, anyvirtuoso can publish a false story of another person, just for revenge perhaps, and the offended person would not be able to defend hims elf beca character there is no restriction of speech. A neighbor in a residential area decides to use a loud microphone to announce his beliefs in the middle of the night, and wakes everybody up. Because that person has every right to speak, nobody can do anything. Even though this is "freedom of speech" it is not allowed in a civilized society. relinquish speech is a very controversial issue because who is really the one to decide what can or cannot be expressed. The freedoms stated in the First Amendment have been controlled for the prot...